A counter-example to persistence in generalised preferential attachment trees

Abstract

Consider a generalised preferential attachment tree with attachment function f, that is a random tree, where at each time-step a node connects to an existing node v with probability proportional to f(deg(v)), where deg(v) denotes the degree of the node in the existing tree. We provide a counter-example to a conjecture of the author asserting that under the assumption Σj=1∞ 1f(j)2 < ∞ there is a persistent hub in the model, that is, a single node that has the maximal degree for all but finitely many time-steps. The counter-example is a minor modification of a related counter-example due to Galganov and Ilienko.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…