Dirac's theorem and the switch geometry of perfect matchings
Abstract
Let G be a graph on an even number n of vertices and let MG be the collection of perfect matchings in G. Dirac's theorem says that if the minimum degree δ(G) of G is at least n/2, then MG is guaranteed to be non-empty, while this is not necessarily the case if δ(G) n/2-1. Given an integer k 2, let Hk(G) be the reconfiguration graph formed on MG by connecting two distinct M1,M2∈ MG by an edge in Hk(G) if M1 can be obtained from M2 by switching at most k edges. Besides non-emptiness, as per Dirac's theorem, what other natural properties of Hk(G) are guaranteed based on the minimum degree δ(G) of G? We show that if δ(G) 2n/3+1, then H2(G) must be connected and an expander, while for each δ (2n-2)/3 there are n-vertex graphs G with minimum degree δ such that H2(G) is disconnected. We also show that, if δ(G) n/2+2, then H3(G) must be connected and an expander, while for each δ n/2-Ck there are n-vertex graphs G with minimum degree δ such that Hk(G) is disconnected, for some Ck depending on k 3. Furthermore, for every >0, there exists a c>1 such that for every k 2 and every large enough n, there are n-vertex graphs G with δ(G) n2- kn such that Hk(G) has at least cn components. With respect to guaranteeing that Hk(G) has positive minimum degree (or, equivalently, no isolated vertices) we show that if δ(G) n/2+1, then H2(G) must have positive minimum degree. For k 3, we show how this threshold for δ(G) is related to the notorious Caccetta-H\"aggkvist conjecture.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.