Ontic Dynamical Locality Reduces to Bell Locality

Abstract

Bell inequalities exclude a broad class of local hidden-variable explanations of quantum correlations. A recurring objection is that the usual Bell form is static, whereas real measuring devices may contain local memory, stochastic dynamics, and measurement-induced disturbances of their hidden variables. We formulate this objection as a general transition-kernel model for dynamical hidden variables. The only locality assumption is imposed at the ontic level: conditional on the pre-measurement ontic state, the transition kernel and response function in each wing depend on the local setting but not on the distant setting or on distant post-measurement variables. Under measurement independence, all such dynamics can be absorbed into effective local response functions. The resulting probabilities have exactly the static Bell-local form and therefore obey the CHSH inequality. The result identifies the available escape routes for reproducing quantum correlations: violating ontic dynamical locality, violating measurement independence, or abandoning a classical hidden-variable ontology. As a consequence, local classical dynamical complexity cannot by itself spoof Bell-nonlocal statistics in device-independent protocols.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…