Light, heavy, primordial: exploring the diversity of black hole seeding and growth mechanisms in the JWST era
Abstract
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revealed a puzzling population of massive black holes in the first billion years, many of which are over-massive compared to their hosts (obese black holes), and reside in metal-poor hosts, posing a challenge for theoretical models at these early epochs. In this work, we compare the observational properties of astrophysically-seeded black holes using the DELPHI semi-analytic model and cosmologically-seeded primordial black holes (PBHs) using the PHANES analytic model. We explore the growth of light ( 100 M) and heavy ( 103-5M) seeds through mergers and accretion (both Eddington-limited and at super-Eddington rates) in the astrophysical scenario; PBHs (seeded between 100.5-6M) only grow through accretion at sub-Eddington rates. Comparing to observables at z 5-10, the only model that can be ruled out is the one where we allow Eddington-limited accretion onto light seeds. The observed high values of the black hole mass-stellar mass relation (0.3-1) can be reproduced by both PBHs and heavy seeds accreting at super-Eddington rates. However, only the PBH and Eddington-limited heavy seeding models can simultaneously reproduce the observed black hole masses ( Mbh), stellar masses (M*), and extremely low host metallicities (Z ≤ 0.01 Z) inferred at z 7-10. Crucially, we find PBHs show decrease in the black hole mass-stellar mass ratio with increasing halo mass at all redshifts, contrary to any astrophysical black hole model. Selecting systems at z 7 with Mbh/M* > 0.1 and bolometric luminosities 1044-46 erg~s-1 that show a negative black hole to stellar mass ratio and reside in 109-11M halos offer a promising clustering-based discriminant of PBH seeding models.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.