Boxing inequalities for relative fractional perimeter and fractional Poincar\'e-type inequalities on John domains with the BBM factor

Abstract

For 0<δ,τ<1 and 1 s nn-δ, we prove that for a given s-John domain ⊂ Rn, the following Boxing inequality holds for every Lebesgue measurable set U⊂ with |U|/||γ<1: \[ Hs(n-δ)∞(UU) C(1-δ)∫∫|x-y|<τdist(y,∂)|U(x)-U(y)||x-y|n+δ\,dx\,dy, \] where Hs(n-δ)∞(U) denotes the s(n-δ)-dimensional Hausdorff content of U, NU is a set of Lebesgue measure zero and the constant C depends only on n,τ,s,γ, the John constant and the diameter of . Moreover, we establish the functional formulation of the above Boxing inequality and discuss the equivalence between these two formulations. Based on the Boxing inequality, we prove the fractional Poincar\'e--Wirtinger trace inequality on s-John domains, of which the fractional Sobolev--Poincar\'e inequality and fractional Hardy-type inequality are special cases. Notably, we prove all of the aforementioned inequalities with the Bourgain--Brezis--Mironescu (BBM) factor 1-δ. Furthermore, with the aid of the Bourgain--Brezis--Mironescu formula, we recover the Poincar\'e--Wirtinger trace inequality. Finally, by showing that, under the separation property, any domain supporting the Boxing inequality is necessarily a John domain, we conclude that the John domain condition is essentially sharp for the above inequalities. All the above inequalities with the BBM factor are new even for Lipschitz domains.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…