Differentiable Forward Modeling for Efficient and Accurate Shear Inference

Abstract

Forthcoming Stage-IV dark energy optical surveys, such as LSST, have the ambitious goal of measuring cosmological parameters at sub-percent precision. Realizing their full scientific potential requires very precise measurement of the cosmic shear signal and control of corresponding systematics. In this work, we present a modern implementation of the Bayesian shear inference framework in Schneider et al. (2014), in the case that the PSF and sky background are known. This framework automatically propagates the pixel-noise measurement error from each galaxy into the final shear estimate, and thus requires no external calibration to handle noise bias. As a first application of this new implementation, we infer the cosmic shear posterior from simulated images consisting of isolated exponential galaxies with LSST-like levels of shape and pixel noise. In this simplified scenario, we estimate the absolute multiplicative bias |m| of our approach to be below 0.9 × 10-3 \, [3σ] when the intrinsic distribution of galaxy properties is known, and below 1.3 × 10-3\, [3σ] when these distributions are inferred alongside shear. Both results are within the LSST requirement of |m| < 2 ×10-3. Additionally, we make progress towards the algorithm's computational feasibility in the context of modern wide-field surveys, where billions of galaxies must be processed, by leveraging differentiable forward models of galaxies, gradient-based samplers, and GPUs. Our final galaxy-fitting MCMC produces 300 effective samples of galaxy properties in 0.45 seconds per galaxy using a single A100 GPU. In the future, we seek to generalize our algorithm to handle selection, detection, and model shear biases so it can be applied to real survey data.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…