Effective Observer-Split Source Terms in Rotating Frames and Gravitomagnetic Backgrounds in Extended Aharonov-Bohm Electrodynamics

Abstract

We examine whether rotating frames and stationary gravitomagnetic backgrounds can provide a meaningful link to extended Aharonov-Bohm electrodynamics without invoking microscopic charge non-conservation. For standard generally covariant, locally U(1)-invariant matter, the answer at the microscopic level is negative: the physical four-current remains covariantly conserved, so neither rotation nor stationary gravitomagnetism by themselves generate a genuine source for the scalar sector. A weaker but still useful connection nevertheless emerges after a 3+1 decomposition with respect to a rotating observer congruence. In that description, the observer-measured transport current on the spatial slice obeys a projected continuity equation containing an exact split source term Isplit 1N Di(\,βi), which reduces in the weak-field regime to IG = Di(\,βi). This term is not a frame-independent microscopic anomaly; it is the bookkeeping term that appears when covariant conservation is rewritten in transport variables adapted to a rotating slicing. We then propose a phenomenological AB-type closure in which this split source drives the scalar sector on finite-scale rotating systems. In the rigid-rotation weak-field limit, the source reduces to IG = ( × r)· ∇ , and for localized transients to IG = ∂φ (δs). The resulting framework is therefore effective rather than fundamental, observer-tied rather than local-inertial, and experimentally meaningful only at mesoscopic or macroscopic scales. It yields concrete operational signatures, including reversal under -, suppression for nearly axisymmetric charge distributions, and sensitivity to transient non-axisymmetric charge structure.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…