Non-Monotonic Rotation Imprint on Time-Integrated Neutrino Spectral Moments in a 15\,M Core-Collapse Supernova Sequence

Abstract

We study the early post-bounce neutrino signal of the published Garching 15\,M rotating core-collapse supernova (CCSN) sequence consisting of non-rotating (NR), slowly rotating (SR, Ω0=0.5 rad\,s-1), and fast-rotating (FR, Ω0=150 rad\,s-1, artificially boosted 300×) three-dimensional models. We present a new analysis of these publicly available simulation data; no new simulations were performed. Our central result, for this specific model sequence, is that SR and FR shift the integrated spectral moments in opposite directions relative to NR: FR drives the spectra toward softer, more-pinched states, while SR moves them weakly toward harder, less-pinched states. Placed in a spectral-shift plane (Δ EL,\,ΔαL), NR sits at the origin, and SR and FR occupy diagonally opposite quadrants, making the non-monotonic response immediately visible as an anti-correlation in two spectral dimensions simultaneously. The focus is the accretion interval t pb=0.05--0.30\,s, where the rotation imprint is strongest. Quantitatively, fast rotation produces Δ EνeL=-0.513\,MeV and Δανe=+0.161, with corresponding shifts Δ EνeL=-0.440\,MeV and Δανe=+0.173; the SR shifts are an order of magnitude smaller and in the opposite sense. The fast-rotation signature is coherent across all 15\,488 lines of sight and is established during early accretion. With only three models from a single progenitor family, this result is a phenomenological characterization of one published sequence and a suggestive indication of a non-monotonic, possibly strongly nonlinear, rotational response within this sequence; the functional form and generality of the dependence on Ω0 remain unconstrained.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…