Microlensing of fast and slow compact objects

Abstract

Gravitational microlensing constraints on non-standard compact objects are conventionally derived assuming lenses trace the dark matter halo with velocities following a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution centered around 10-3c. However, a variety of theoretical scenarios predict populations of compact objects whose velocities deviate dramatically from those of virialized halo dark matter -- ultrarelativistic primordial black holes from cosmic string collapse, mirror neutron stars, gravitationally kicked black hole merger remnants, dark matter nuggets, free floaters ejected from gravitationally bound systems, disk-formed compact objects, and so on. For a given Einstein crossing time, the speed-mass degeneracy inherent in it means that fast (slow) lenses produce events at larger (smaller) masses than spanned by standard windows, opening qualitatively new regions of parameter space. After deriving model-independent upper limits on the microlensing event rate, we obtain mass-dependent constraints on the density of lens populations with speeds spanning 10-4c-10-1c from surveys of M31 by Subaru-HSC and the LMC by OGLE with different observing cadences. We do this for two benchmark velocity distributions -- Maxwell-Boltzmann and Dirac delta -- and two spatial distributions -- uniform and NFW, and exclude lens densities and masses that differ from dark matter constraints by orders of magnitude. We examine the effect of the transverse motion of the source and observer relative to the lensing tube, which becomes significant for our slow lenses. We also show that, unlike in dark matter searches, for our fast lenses an increase in the cadence of observations would probe smaller masses without suppression of event rates from the finite source and wave optics effects.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…