Tight Bounds for some W[1]-hard Problems Parameterized by Multi-clique-width

Abstract

In this work we contribute to the study of the fine-grained complexity of problems parameterized by multi-clique-width, which was initiated by F\"urer [ITCS 2017] and pursued further by Chekan and Kratsch [MFCS 2023]. Multi-clique-width is a parameter defined analogously to clique-width but every vertex is allowed to hold multiple labels simultaneously. This parameter is upper-bounded by both clique-width and treewidth (plus a constant), hence it generalizes both of them without an exponential blow-up. Conversely, graphs of multi-clique-width k have clique-width at most 2k, and there exist graphs with clique-width at least 2(k). Thus, while the two parameters are functionally equivalent, the fine-grained complexity of problems may differ relative to them. As our first and main result we show that under ETH the Max Cut problem cannot be solved in time n2o(k) · f(k) on graphs of multi-clique-width k for any computable function f. For clique-width k an nO(k) algorithm by Fomin et al. [SIAM J. Comput. 2014] is tight under ETH. This makes Max Cut the first known problem for which the tight running times differ for parameterization by clique-width and multi-clique-width and it contributes to the short list of known lower bounds of form n2o(k) · f(k). As our second contribution we show that Hamiltonian Cycle and Edge Dominating Set can be solved in time nO(k) on graphs of multi-clique-width k matching the tight running time for clique-width. These results answer three questions left open by Chekan and Kratsch [MFCS 2023].

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…