An exact small-n computation of the minimum 2-coloring discrepancy of Kn(3)

Abstract

For an integer r 2 and an order n 1, 3 6, write δr(n) for the minimum, over all r-colourings χ: [n]3 [r], of S disc(S, χ), where the maximum is over labelled Steiner triple systems S of order n and disc(S, χ) = c |\#\T ∈ S : χ(T) = c\ - |S|/r|. Following Gishboliner, Glock, and Sgueglia GishbolinerGlockSgueglia2025, the bulk of the recent work on this quantity has been on lower bounds for r 3 (proving δr(n) = Ω(n2)) and on structural characterisation of the low-discrepancy 2-colourings. We give three small computational contributions in the small-n regime n ∈ \7, 9, 13, 15, 19, 21\: An exact value of δ2(n) for each such n, matching the formula δ2(n) = x ∈ [0, n] Z |x(n-x)/2 - n(n-1)/12| obtained by optimising the GGS Example 1.1 family. Rigorous for n ∈ \7, 9\ via exhaustive search over labelled STSs (30 resp. 840 systems) and over all 2-colourings; computational for n ∈ \13, 15, 19, 21\ by simulated-annealing search; A wide near-optimal basin: at n = 9, every two-colour-flip neighbour of the optimal Example~1.1 colouring that maintains discrepancy 1.0 exists; about 34\% of two-flip perturbations preserve optimality; Random-colouring statistics for r ∈ \2, 3, 4\: Sdisc grows linearly in n, in agreement with a heuristic Gaussian estimate n / 6r · 2 K over K sampled labellings; the typical-case discrepancy is far below the GGS worst-case Ω(n2). We additionally state a conjectural exact formula for δ2(n) that holds for every n 1, 3 6.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…