On Sampling Lower Bounds for Polynomials

Abstract

In this work, we continue the line of research on the complexity of distributions (Viola, Journal of Computing 2012), and study samplers defined by low degree polynomials. An n-tuple P = (P1,…, Pn) of functions Pi F2m F2 defines a distribution over \0,1\n in the natural way: draw X uniformly at random from F2m and output (P1(X),…, Pn(X)) ∈ \0,1\n. We show that when P is defined by polynomials of degree d, the total variation distance of P from the product distribution Ber(1/3) n is 1-on(1), where on(1) is a vanishing function of n for any constant degree d. For small values of d, we show the following concrete bounds. (i) For d=1 we have \|P-Ber(1/3) n\|TV ≥ 1-(-(n)). (ii) For d=2 we have \|P-Ber(1/3) n\|TV ≥ 1-(-((n)/(n))). (iii) For d=3 we have \|P-Ber(1/3) n\|TV ≥ 1-(-((n))). Our results extend the recent lower bound results for sampling distributions, which have mostly focused on local samplers, small depth decision trees, and small depth circuits. As part of our proof, we establish the following result, that may be of independent interest: for any degree-d polynomial P2m F2 it holds that X[P(X) = 1] is bounded away from 1/3 by some absolute constant δ = δd>0. Although the statement may seem obvious, we are not aware of an elementary proof of this. The proof techniques rely on the structural results for low degree polynomials, saying that any biased polynomial of degree d can be written as a function of a small number of polynomials of degree d-1.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…