Lower Bounds for Approximate Sign Rank

Abstract

We prove new upper and lower bounds on ε-approximate sign-rank, a relaxation of sign-rank introduced by Chornomaz, Moran, and Waknine (STOC 2025). We show that every m × n sign matrix with approximate sign-rank d contains a monochromatic rectangle of size d-O(d)m × d-O(d2)n, paralleling classical results for exact sign-rank. As an application, we establish a lower bound of Ω(d/ d) on the ε-approximate sign-rank of large-margin d-dimensional half-spaces. Prior to our work, the only general lower bound technique known for approximate sign-rank yielded bounds of strength ε-1 - 1, which are constant for fixed ε. A key ingredient is a new geometric theorem on hyperplane avoidance: for any set of n points in general position in Rd, there exist d subsets, each of size d-O(d) n, such that no hyperplane simultaneously splits all of them. The proof combines the Forster-Barthe isotropic position theorem with the Bourgain-Tzafriri restricted invertibility principle. We also study the relationship between approximate sign-rank and VC dimension. We prove a lower bound on approximate sign-rank in terms of VC dimension, and exhibit concept classes of VC dimension 2 with large approximate sign-rank. Finally, we study the approximate sign-rank of the 2m × 2m Hadamard matrix Hm. The sign-rank of Hm is known to be Ω(2m) by Forster's classic theorem. Contrasting this, we adapt an argument of Alman and Williams to show that the approximate sign-rank of Hm is at most mO(m (1/ε)), and hence the Hadamard matrix does not witness polynomial-strength lower bounds for approximate sign-rank. Using our VC dimension bound, we prove that the approximate sign-rank of Hm is at least Ωε(m).

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…