Electron-impact ionization rates for neutral He, Li, and Be in the Tsallis framework

Abstract

The single-ionization rate coefficient of a plasma neutral depends both on the microscopic electron-impact cross section and on the macroscopic shape of the electron energy distribution function (EEDF). We present a reproducible benchmark and sensitivity study -- not a new theory -- of these two effects for the three lightest neutrals He, Li, and Be, combining the recommended Bell~et~al.\ (1983) cross sections with a properly normalized two-temperature Tsallis q-generalized EEDF and varying q on both sides of the Maxwellian limit and the hot-electron fraction fhot at Thot=10\,Tbulk. The calculation cleanly separates two independent uncertainty axes -- cross-section model (Bell vs.\ Lotz) and EEDF shape (Maxwellian vs.\ Tsallis). The Bell--Lotz spread on τM is small for He (within about 7\%), moderate for Be ( 17\%), and largest for Li (up to +95\% at T=1~keV); sub-extensive distributions (q<1) suppress ionization through a hard tail cut-off, while super-extensive distributions (q>1) enhance low-temperature ionization through a -like power-law tail with =1/(q-1). The quantitatively safest non-Maxwellian cases are q=1 and q=1.2 (=5), which lie inside the finite-mean-energy regime; the cases q=1.4 and q=1.6 are retained as heavy-tail stress tests and should be read as qualitative trends rather than as quantitatively reliable predictions. Both EEDF effects scale with Ip/kBT, so He responds most strongly and Li least. The full numerical pipeline is released as a persistent reproducibility package, intended as a drop-in non-Maxwellian ionization module for collisional-radiative and ionization-balance modelling of light-neutral plasmas.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…