Extremal problems on [a, b]-covered graphs

Abstract

A graph G is [a,b]-covered if for each edge e of G there is an [a,b]-factor containing it. For a=b=1, an [a,b]-covered graph is a matching covered graph. The structural theory of matching covered graphs constitutes a cornerstone of modern matching theory. Determining whether a given graph is matching covered is a fundamental problem in structural graph theory. Lucchesi et al. [SIAM J. Discrete Math., 2018] showed that a connected graph G is matching covered if and only if every barrier of G is a stable set. In this paper, we completely characterize the extremal graphs that maximize the size or the spectral radius among all non-matching-covered graphs. For a ≤ b and b ≥ 2, Hao and Li [Electron. J. Combin., 2024] investigated the extremal problems on [a,b]-factor graphs: If G contains no [a,b]-factors, then e(G)≤ n-12+a-1 with equality if and only if G Hn,a, where Hn,a = Ka-1 (Kn-a K1). Moreover, if G contains no [a,b]-factors, then (G)≤ (Hn,a) with equality if and only if G Hn,a. Judging from the structral characterization, non-[a,b]-covered graphs exhibit highly complex structures, making the associated extremal problems significantly challenging. To overcome this, we develop a novel minimum-degree forcing technique. Combining this technique and spectral-structural analysis, we in this paper provide complete characterizations of the extremal graphs that maximize the size or the spectral radius within the set of non-[a,b]-covered graphs. An intriguing phenomenon revealed by our results is that Hn,a remains both the size-extremal graph and the spectral extremal graph for this larger set of non-[a,b]-covered graphs. Consequently, our results strengthen the results of Hao-Li.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…