Trade-off Functions for DP-SGD with Subsampling based on Random Shuffling: Tight Upper and Lower Bounds

Abstract

We derive a tight analysis of the trade-off function for Differentially Private Stochastic Gradient Descent (DP-SGD) with subsampling based on random shuffling within the f-DP framework. Our analysis covers the regime σ≥ 3/ M, where σ is the noise multiplier and M is the number of rounds within a single epoch. Unlike f-DP analyses for Poisson subsampling, which yield non-closed implicit formulas that can be machine computed but are non-transparent, random shuffling admits a tight analysis yielding transparent and interpretable closed-form bounds. Our concrete bounds, derived via the Berry-Esseen theorem, are tight up to constant factors within the proof framework. We demonstrate worked parameter settings for a single epoch (E=1) with a corresponding trade-off function ≥ 1-a-δ, that is, only δ below the ideal random guessing diagonal 1-a: For δ= 1/100 and σ= 1, roughly M ≈ 1.14× 106 rounds and N ≈ 1.14× 107 training samples suffice to achieve meaningful differential privacy. This is in contrast to recent negative results for the regime σ≤ 1/2 M. Our concrete bounds can be composed over multiple epochs leading to δ having a linear in E dependency, which restricts E=O(M). To go beyond Berry--Esseen, we introduce a new proof technique based on a generalization of the law of large numbers that yields an asymptotic random guessing diagonal-limit result: if E=cM2M with cM 0, then the E-fold composed trade-off function satisfies f E(a) 1-a uniformly in a∈[0,1] with δ having only an O(E) dependency. We compare this asymptotic regime with the corresponding Poisson subsampling asymptotic, and highlight the characterization of explicit convergence rates as an open question.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…