New Extremal Ranges and Constructions of the Erdős--Kleitman Problem
Abstract
For integers n s2, let e(n,s) denote the maximum size of a family F⊂eq2[n] with no s pairwise disjoint members. The problem of determining e(n,s), now called the Erdős--Kleitman problem, is the non-uniform analogue of the Erdős matching conjecture. We prove that for every fixed m3, there exist constants βm and δm such that for sufficiently large s, the extremal families for e(ms+c,s) are \[ P'(m,s,;L'):=L'm[ms+c] m+1 \] for some L' with =s-c and |L'|=m-1, when βm s(m-1)/m c δm s. This determines the extremal families in an unknown range when is large, complementing our earlier work on the range when is small. Moreover, for m=3, we sharpen this to the asymptotically optimal range. Let \[ t(s)=17-18s+49-852s+1284s220=0.8916·s s+O(1) \] We prove that \( P'(3,s,;L')\) is the unique extremal family when t(s)<<s-((4/3)1/3+o(1))s2/3. Note that the lower bound \(t(s)\) of is exact, while the the constant \((4/3)1/3\) in the upper bound of is best possible. Kupavskii and Sokolov introduced four candidate extremal families and conjectured that the value of e(n,s) is the maximum of their sizes. We disprove this conjecture by constructing a new family R(m,s,) that is larger than each of their four proposed candidates when α Rs1/2 c β Rs(m-1)/m for some constants α R and β R. This also shows that the exponent (m-1)/m in the first result is tight.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.