Computational and Combinatorial Results on Conflict-free Choosability

Abstract

The conflict-free closed neighborhood (CFCN*) chromatic number of a graph G = (V,E) is the smallest positive integer k for which there exists a coloring of a subset of vertices using k colors such that, for every vertex in V, there exists a color that appears exactly once in its closed neighborhood. The conflict-free open neighborhood (CFON*) chromatic number is defined analogously. In this paper, we study `list variants' of the above-mentioned coloring parameters. The conflict-free closed neighborhood (CFCN*) choice number of a graph G = (V,E) is the smallest positive integer k such that for every assignment of lists of size k to its vertices, there exists a coloring of a subset of vertices, say V', in which (i) every vertex in V' receives a color from its list, and (ii) for every vertex in V there exists some color that appears exactly once in its closed neighborhood. The conflict-free open neighborhood (CFON*) choice number is defined analogously. Debski and Przyby o [Journal of Graph Theory, 2022] showed that for any graph G with maximum degree , the CFCN* chromatic number of its line graph is O( ). This result was later extended to claw-free graphs by Bhyravarapu et al. [Journal of Graph Theory, 2025], who proved that every K1,k-free graph G admits a CFCN* coloring using O(k ) colors. In this paper, we generalize this result to the list setting and show that every K1,k-free graph G has a CFCN* choice number of O(k ). Further, we answer some questions concerning the hardness of computing CFCN*/CFON* choice numbers posed by Gupta and Mathew [SOFSEM, 2026]; in particular, we show that it is NP-hard to determine whether the CFCN*/CFON* choice number a graph is equal to k, for k=1,2.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…