Distributed Statistical Zero-Knowledge Proofs via Sumcheck

Abstract

We study distributed zero-knowledge proofs, introduced by Bick, Kol, and Oshman (SODA 2022). While distributed interactive proofs have advanced rapidly, general-purpose techniques for distributed zero-knowledge remain limited and mostly problem-specific. We address this gap by introducing distributed statistical zero-knowledge, requiring that each node's view be simulatable within negligible statistical distance, and by lifting the classical Sumcheck protocol (Lund, Fortnow, Karloff, and Nisan, FOCS 1990) into a modular primitive for distributed zero-knowledge proofs. Our main contribution is a distributed zero-knowledge implementation of Sumcheck. Given oracle access to a polynomial F over a finite field F with N variables, we design a protocol verifying claims of the form Σx∈F F(x)=a using O(N) rounds of O( |F|)-bit messages, while achieving statistical zero-knowledge and small soundness error. We apply this primitive to two problems. For non-k-colorability, we obtain an O(n)-round distributed statistical zero-knowledge proof deciding whether a graph is not k-colorable, for any constant k, using O(log1+o(1) n)-bit messages. This is the first nontrivial distributed interactive proof for this problem, even without zero-knowledge guarantees. For Subgraph Counting, we obtain an O(k n)-round, O(k n)-bit distributed statistical zero-knowledge proof for counting copies of a given k-node pattern, improving previous distributed interactive proofs while additionally providing statistical zero-knowledge. Finally, we show that additional round compression of Sumcheck is problem-dependent: for non-3-colorability on constant-degree graphs, we prove a lower bound excluding o(n/ n) rounds under polynomial-time local computation.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…