Trace definability IV: higher arity notions

Abstract

Motivated by the &#34;composition theorems&#34; of Chernikov-Hempel and Abd Aldaim-Conant-Terry we introduce k-trace definability between first order theories. Any theory which is k-trace definable in a NIP theory is k-NIP and any theory which is 2-trace definable in a stable theory is 2-NFOP. All known examples of k-NIP theories are k-trace definable in NIP theories. We show that for several of the main examples of k-NIP theories T there is a NIP theory T* such that T is the (unique up to a certain notion of equivalence) universal theory which is k-trace definable in T*. For example the theory of Hilbert space is the universal theory which is 2-trace definable in RCF, the theory of the generic class k nilpotent Lie algebra over Fp is the universal theory which is k-trace definable in the theory of infinite Fp-vector spaces, the theory of the generic k-hypergraph is the universal theory which is k-trace definable in the theory of a set with two elements, and the theory of Uryshon space is the universal theory which is 2-trace definable in the theory of (R; +, <). We construct the universal theory Dk(T) which is k-trace definable in an arbitrary theory T.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…