Box Progressions, Abelian Power-Free Morphisms and A Sieve Technique for the Template Method
Abstract
Given balls and boxes both enumerated by the positive integers, we consider a sequential allocation of the balls into the boxes. We fix 2. Proceeding in increasing order of box labels, assign to each box the next r smallest balls for some 1≤ r≤. Given an integer k 3, is there a natural number N such that in any placement of N balls into boxes, there exist k balls whose labels and box labels each form a k-term arithmetic progression? We address this question by identifying abelian power-free fixed points of morphisms over a binary alphabet. We present sufficient conditions under which a morphism is abelian k-power-free. Our conditions extend Dekking's result over a binary alphabet and offer a weaker, yet more effective alternative to Carpi's. Combining Dekking's result with the template method of Currie and Rampersad, we develop a sieve technique that significantly reduces the number of parents that must be examined to establish abelian power-freeness. We then identify a binary morphism that is abelian 16-power free (but not abelian 15-power free) with an abelian 14-power free fixed point, demonstrating the strength of our technique in verifying abelian power-freeness. Furthermore, we give a binary morphism which is not abelian power-free, yet has an abelian 5-power free fixed point. These results offer novel examples of morphisms whose fixed points exhibit stronger abelian power-freeness than the corresponding morphisms.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.