Uncertainty Quantification of the 76Ge Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay Nuclear Matrix Element

Abstract

The experimental pursuit of neutrinoless double-beta decay (0νββ) constitutes one of the most compelling avenues for probing lepton-number violation and exploring physics beyond the Standard Model. Within this landscape, 76Ge has consistently ranked among the most promising isotopes for current and next-generation bolometric and liquid-scintillator experiments, notably GERDA and LEGEND. In the present work, we adapt a rigorous statistical protocol previously established for 48Ca~Horoi-prc22 and 136Xe~Horoi-Xe-2023 to the 76Ge system, utilizing a valence configuration that aligns with our recent investigation of 82Se~Neacsu-Symmetry-2024. Our methodology introduces systematic, bounded fluctuations to the two-body matrix elements of established effective interactions, subsequently monitoring how these perturbations propagate through a suite of low-energy nuclear observables. Special emphasis is placed on the 0νββ nuclear matrix element (NME), whose theoretical uncertainty currently dominates the interpretation of experimental half-life limits. By integrating these simulated variations into a Bayesian Model Averaging framework and benchmarking against empirical spectroscopic data, we derive a constrained probability distribution for the NME. The resulting analysis yields a central value of 2.46 with an associated standard deviation of 0.25, thereby quantifying the intrinsic theoretical spread within the interacting shell model approach. Furthermore, we perform a comprehensive correlation analysis across all computed observables to evaluate internal consistency, identify non-trivial structural dependencies, and establish benchmarks that may guide the refinement of future effective interactions.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…