Induced/Incomparable versus Ramsey
Abstract
We consider the following problem: Let H and F be two graphs on k vertices and assume F ≠ H. We say that H and F are incomparable if neither F nor H contains the other. Let H be a graph on k vertices and let G be a graph on at least k vertices. Then G is said to be H-exact if any induced subgraph of G on k vertices is either isomorphic to H or incomparable with H. Exact(H) is the family of all graphs G which are H-exact. We pose the following problem: For a graph H on k vertices, determine or estimate f(H) = \n: ∃ G ∈ Exact(H), |V (G)| = n\. Among the many results obtained in this paper the following are representatives concerning trees and matchings: 1. For a tree on k ≥ 3 vertices, (k - 1)( k2 -1 ) ≤ f(T) ≤ ( k-1)2. 2. For k ≥ 4, f(K1,k-1) = (k-1)(k-2). 3. For k ≥ 5, f(Pk) = (k-1)22 if k is odd and f(Pk) = (k-1)(k-2)2+1 if k is even. 4. f(nK2) = 3n for n = 2, 3 and f(nK2) = 4n - 4 for n ≥ 4.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.