Mathematical Foundations for Peer-to-Peer Lattice Computation
Abstract
We give structured proofs for five mathematical propositions governing synchronous peer-to-peer computation on a finite grid graph embedded in Z2. Proposition 1 gives three lower bounds: a transport-work bound Σi ai i ≥ W1(μ,ν) attained by every shortest-path schedule; a completion-depth bound D ≥ rμ attained by non-congesting parallel routing; and a compressive-reduction edge bound |E'| ≥ StG(supp(μ)\x\). A negative result refutes naive O(factP3/2) concentration for sink-trunk loads under corner-sink dimension-order routing, showing variance Θ(fact(1-fact)P2). Proposition 2 establishes, under the α-β-γ collective-communication and a Mixture-of-Experts sparse-activation model, that the grid-to-cluster latency ratio improves monotonically as fact shrinks whenever cluster fixed overhead dominates the grid geometric constant. Proposition 3 identifies a sufficient algebraic criterion for schedule-independent reduction: update rules decomposing into a local map and an abelian-monoid merge, expressed as a product-preserving functor from the Lawvere theory of commutative monoids into the hardware-state category. Proposition 4 bounds the conditional expected route length under i.i.d. site failure in the subcritical regime δ< pcsite(Z2) by an additive detour, using Aizenman-Barsky exponential cluster-size decay. Proposition 5 augments the grid with k uniform long-range shortcuts per node, collapsing the typical shortest-path length from Θ(P) to O( P) under a mean-field (Erdős-Rényi) universality argument -- rigorous for the 1-D-ring base (Newman-Watts-Strogatz), conjectural for the 2-D-grid base.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.