Constraints on Dynamical Dark Energy from Multiple Probes in the Full Dark Energy Survey

Abstract

We present results on dark energy evolution, assuming a time-dependent equation of state w(a)=w0+wa(1-a), from growth and geometric probes using the full six-year Dark Energy Survey dataset: type Ia supernovae, baryon acoustic oscillations, and weak gravitational lensing and galaxy clustering (3×2pt). The combination yields w0=-0.84+0.10-0.10 and wa=-0.44+0.60-0.55, the tightest constraints ever obtained from a single survey, with 2.2σ deviation from a cosmological constant. Adding the DESI DR2 BAO data yields w0=-0.84+0.06-0.07 and wa=-0.53+0.33-0.28, representing the most stringent low-redshift-only test of dynamical dark energy to date, with a 2.3σ deviation. In this combination, adding 3×2pt doubles the constraining power. Finally, when combined with primary CMB information, we obtain w0=-0.82+0.05-0.05, wa=-0.63+0.21-0.18, with a 3.0σ deviation. We find that including 3×2pt in the previously studied SN + DESI BAO + CMB combination leaves the significance essentially unchanged (3.2 σ to 3.0σ) while improving the figure of merit by 10\%. We systematically investigate the impact of leaving out each one of the probes and find that the significance of the deviation from a cosmological constant ranges from 2.3 to 3.2σ, with best-fit parameters consistently in the region w0 >-1 and wa <0. Excluding SN from the all data combination yields a 2.6σ departure from ΛCDM, providing a cross-check independent of supernova photometric calibration. These results support the weak preference for evolving dark energy reported by several recent cosmological analyses. By combining growth and geometric probes from a single survey, this work realizes the multi-probe dark energy program envisioned at the inception of DES.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…