A finite victory over de Bruijn-Erdős in interval discrepancy
Abstract
We study a finite form of the classical interval discrepancy problem. Starting from the unit interval, one repeatedly splits an existing interval into two until n intervals have been produced. The discrepancy of such a process is the maximum, over all intermediate stages, of the ratio between the longest interval and the shortest interval. A theorem of de Bruijn and Erdős from 1949 shows that this ratio must approach 2 as n∞, and they give a sharp construction achieving this bound. For fixed n, their construction gives the upper bound disc(n)≤ 2-32n+O(1/n2). In this paper, we improve the first-order term of this bound. Specifically, we construct a strategy, called lex-merge, with disc(n)≤ 2-4 2n+O(1/n2). We prove also the lower bound disc(n)≥ 2-6 2n-O(1/n2), showing that the first-order term in this improvement over the de Bruijn--Erdős construction has the correct order of magnitude. We conjecture that the lex-merge strategy is optimal for every n.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.