γ-CounterBoost: Optimizing response time tails using job type information only
Abstract
In a recent paper the γ-Boost scheduling policy was shown to minimize the tail of the response time distribution in a light-tailed M/G/1-queue. This policy schedules jobs using a boosted arrival time, defined as the arrival time of a job minus its boost, where the boost of a job depends on its exact job size. The γ-Boost policy can also be used when only partial job size information is available, such as the type of an incoming job. In such case the boost bi of a job depends solely on its type i and γ-Boost was shown to optimize the tail among all boost policies, where a boost policy is fully determined by the bi values. In the partial information setting γ-Boost relies on two types of information: job types and arrival times. This paper focuses on the problem of minimizing the tail in a light-tailed M/G/1-queue in the partial job size information setting when the scheduler only makes use of the job types and does not exploit arrival times. Prior work showed that in case of 2 job types the so-called Nudge-M policy minimizes the tail in a large class of scheduling policies. In this paper we introduce the γ-CounterBoost policy in the partial information setting with d ≥ 2 job types and prove that it minimizes the tail in an even broader class of scheduling policies called Contextual CounterBoost policies. The γ-CounterBoost policy reduces to the Nudge-M policy in case of d=2 job types.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.