Abundance of Unique Subhypergraphs

Abstract

Given k-uniform hypergraphs G and H, we say that G is a unique subhypergraph of H if H contains exactly one subhypergraph isomorphic to G. For an n-vertex k-graph H, let fk(H) be the number of non-isomorphic unique subhypergraphs of H, normalized by 2 n k/n!, and let fk(n) be the maximum of fk(H) over all n-vertex k-graphs H. In the graph case k=2, Erdős asked whether there exists a constant δ>0 such that f2(n)>δ for all n, offering \100 for a proof and \25 for a disproof. Recently, Bradač and Christoph answered this question in the negative,, proving that f2(n) tends to 0, or equivalently that no n-vertex graph contains a positive proportion of all n-vertex graphs as unique subgraphs. In this paper we show that the situation is fundamentally different for k-uniform hypergraphs with k3. In particular, for every fixed integer k 3, we prove that n∞ fk(n) 2/9.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…