Deformation Theory and Torus-Fixed Geometry of the Nested Hilbert Scheme of Points
Abstract
In this paper, we study the nested Hilbert scheme (A2)[n,n+1]=Hilbn,n+1(A2) from a combination of deformation theory, torus actions, and Young diagram combinatorics. We first recall the scheme theory and functor basics needed to define Hilbert schemes. We then use a classic result on first-order deformations to identify TI(A2)[n] HomC[x,y](I,C[x,y]/I). For a nested pair I⊂ J, with CC[x,y]/I=n+1 and CC[x,y]/J=n, the tangent space becomes a compatibility kernel T(I,J)(A2)[n,n+1] (Hom(I,R/I) Hom(J,R/J) Hom(I,R/J)). The torus-fixed points are indexed by a partition λ n+1 together with a removable corner c of its Young diagram. This corner is not only combinatorial, but also the monomial form of a one dimensional socle direction in R/Iλ. The blow-up map to (A2)[n]× A2 has fibres given by projective spaces of one-dimensional quotients of J/ mpJ, whose torus-fixed points are addable boxes of the smaller diagram. These two local fibres explain how the universal family, the blow-up geometry, and Young diagram combinatorics come together in the study of the local geometry of the nested Hilbert scheme of points. Finally, we derive the tangent weight formula at a fixed point (Iλ,Iλ c) in the torus convention used in the paper. Using the standard arrow basis, we show in the proof how the arm-leg weights are modified by the compatibility kernel through a shortening rule determined by c. A Macaulay2 verification computes the compatibility kernel from monomial syzygies and checks the weight formula for all partitions of size at most 16.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.