Erdős Problem 684 at Density One: Small-prime Parts of Binomial Coefficients and Gaussian Fluctuations
Abstract
For 0≤ k≤ n, let u(n,k) be the largest divisor of nk whose prime factors are at most k. Erdős Problem #684 concerns the special threshold u(n,k)>n2 and asks how early this small-prime part can be forced to become large. We prove the density-one analogue for every fixed power threshold. If fc(n) is the least k for which u(n,k)>nc, then, for each fixed c>0, \[ fc(n)=(c1-γ+o(1)) n \] for almost all positive integers n. In particular, \[ f2(n)=(21-γ+o(1)) n =(4.730544237…+o(1)) n \] for the Erdős #684 threshold. This is a normal-order theorem, not a pointwise resolution of the corresponding worst-case problem. The constant 1-γ is arithmetic. Kummer's theorem rewrites u(n,k) as a sum of carry indicators, and complete-residue averaging gives \[ m(k)=kΣp≤ k pp-1- k!=(1-γ)k+o(k). \] The cancellation in this formula moves the typical crossing from the naive scale c n to c(1-γ)-1 n. We prove the required concentration uniformly for every k≤ A X on one dyadic interval, after discarding a zero-density exceptional set caused by large powers of small primes dividing one of the nearby integers n,n-1,…. We also prove Gaussian fluctuations in the logarithmic range. If k=k(X)∞, k≤ A X, and n is uniform in [X,2X) Z, then \[ u(n,k)-m(k)V(k)⇒ N(0,1), V(k) (2-(2π))k k. \] Higher prime powers are needed for the mean, but after centering their aggregate is L2-negligible on the Gaussian scale; the variance comes only from the prime levels.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.