Strategyproof Mechanisms for Euclidean Facility Location Problems under Lp-norm Social Cost

Abstract

We study strategyproof mechanisms for eliciting agents' location preferences truthfully in the Euclidean plane R2 and locating a facility so as to minimize the Lp-norm social cost, defined as the Lp-norm of the vector of distances from the facility to the agents' preferred locations, for any p 1. While the cases p=1 and p=∞ have been well-studied, open questions remain about the optimal approximation ratios achievable by strategyproof mechanisms for general p. Our first result resolves an open question of Goel and Hann-Caruthers [Soc. Choice Welf. 2023]. They showed that the coordinate-wise median (CM) mechanism achieves an approximation ratio lying between \(21-1p\) and \(232-2p\) for p 2, and they conjectured that it is exactly \(21-1p\). We confirm this conjecture, and we further show that CM has a tight 2-approximation for 1 p 2. Our second and third results demonstrate that two randomized mechanisms can yield better approximation ratios. In particular, we first consider the uniformly rotated coordinate-wise median (URCM) mechanism, and prove that, for \(1 p<2\), its approximation ratio strictly improves over the deterministic bound \(2\), while no such improvement is possible for p 2. We then study the centroid random dictatorship mechanism that returns the average location (i.e., centroid) and the random dictatorship each with half probability, and show that its approximation ratio strictly improves over CM and URCM for every finite \(p 1.6\). Moreover, our analysis independently recovers the classical deterministic and randomized results for p=1 [Meir, SAGT 2019] [Barak, EC 2026] and p=∞ [Goel and Hann-Caruthers, SCW 2023] [Tang et al., EC 2020] using significantly different techniques.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…