Sharp Bounds for Guiduli-Type Hereditary Spectral Problems
Abstract
Guiduli asked in 1996 the following problem concerning the maximum spectral radius of a graph under hereditary density constraints. If an n-vertex graph G satisfies e(H) c|V(H)|2 for every subgraph H of G, must one have λ(G) 2cn? More generally, what remains true when the exponent 2 is replaced by a constant less than 2? We study the natural power-law version of this question for all 1<p2. For 1<p 2, define \[ dp(G)= S⊂eq V(G)e(G[S])|S|p. \] We determine the sharp asymptotic upper bound for λ(G) in terms of dp(G) and n. More precisely, every n-vertex graph G with at least one edge satisfies \[ λ(G) cases ((t∈ N1t(t+1)p)-1+o(1))dp(G) n,&1<p<3/2,\\[0.4em] (334+o(1))dp(G)n n,&p=3/2,\\[0.4em] ( Cp+o(1))dp(G)np-1,&3/2<p<2, cases \] and each constant here is best possible. Here Cp is characterized by an exact variational problem over finite kernels. We apply a sparse graphon operator estimate to convert hereditary p-density bounds into sharp spectral bounds, and this estimate also explains the transition at the critical exponent p=3/2. For the endpoint p=2, Wilf's theorem gives the exact finite-n bound λ(G) 2d2(G)n, with equality for Kn. Thus Guiduli's power-law problem is resolved in its sharp asymptotic form for every 1<p≤2, including exact leading constants.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.