No need to stay positive: a practical approach to direct numerical simulations of elastic turbulence
Abstract
Successfully performing direct numerical simulations of polymeric flows remains a major challenge in computational fluid mechanics. In addition to the velocity field, such simulations must resolve polymeric degrees of freedom, often expressed via the conformation tensor, c, which captures the local stretch of polymer molecules. A key difficulty here lies in maintaining the physical requirement Tr\, c>3, which is not explicitly enforced by the governing equations. Consequently, simulations initiated from physical conditions may silently drift into unphysical states with Tr\, c<0, indicating a loss of positive-definiteness of the conformation tensor. Existing numerical methods to prevent this are costly, making direct numerical simulations of chaotic polymer flows, such as elastic turbulence, heavily reliant on high-performance computing. Here, we ask whether simulations that violate Tr\, c>3 can still yield meaningful physical insight into the underlying dynamics. We simulate a model dilute polymer solution driven through a plane channel at low Reynolds number and observe the transition to elastic turbulence. Our simulations exhibit two threshold resolutions: below the first, they become numerically unstable and exhibit a finite-time blow-up; above the second, they maintain positive-definiteness. In between, simulations remain stable and chaotic despite local violations of Tr\, c>3. Surprisingly, these violations do not affect mid-plane statistics of velocity, its gradients, or polymer stretch, which match results from fully positive-definite simulations. This suggests that resolving flow structures or key flow statistics may not require the extreme resolutions needed to preserve positive-definiteness, potentially lowering computational barriers for studying elastic turbulence.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.