Synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate and other structure growth probes in testing gravity
Abstract
We test gravity by exploiting the synergy between the gravitational potential decay rate (DR) and complementary structure-growth probes: these observables respond to MG parameters with different degeneracy directions, so their combination yields stronger constraints than any single probe. We adopt the tomographic DR measurements reported in 2025ApJ...982...99D and combine them with CMB-lensing-tomography Σ8 constraints and fσ8 measurements from DESI DR1 full-shape analyses and the DESI peculiar-velocity field. We apply this joint data vector to two representative frameworks: phenomenological parameterizations and the Effective Field Theory (EFT) α-basis. For the phenomenological form P MG(a)=1+P MG,0\,Ω DE(a)/Ω DE(0), where P MG denotes μ, η, or Σ, we obtain μ0=0.090.35 and Σ0=0.010.06. Compared to the measurements combination Σ8+fσ8, including DR tightens the constraint on Σ0 by a factor of 2. For the (μ0,η0) case we find μ0=0.06+0.17-0.23 and η0=-0.03+0.36-0.46; relative to Σ8+fσ8, adding DR improves the constraints on both parameters by a factor of 1.5. In the EFT α-basis, adopting the parameterization αi(a)=ci\,Ω DE(a) with i∈\ M,B\, we find c M=0.64+0.32-0.72 and c B=0.31+0.19-0.29. The corresponding EFT uncertainties are about a factor of 2 smaller than those reported in 2025JCAP...09..053I, which combined DESI full-shape and BAO measurements with DES-SN5YR and CMB data. These results demonstrate the capability of DR and the necessity of including the DR measurements in testing gravity.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.