A Structural Separation Between Chernoff and Convex-Order Optimality in Robust Testing
Abstract
In classical robust hypothesis testing, least favorable distributions often simultaneously maximize all Chernoff u-affinities and minimize all f-divergences. This paper identifies the structural mechanism that causes this equivalence to fail in general: the cone generated by fractional power functions \xu\u∈(0,1) is strictly smaller than the cone of convex functions, inducing a separation between fractional-moment dominance and convex-order dominance. An explicit minimal counterexample is constructed on a three-point probability space, with convex, compact uncertainty classes and uniformly bounded likelihood ratios, for which a single pair maximizes all Chernoff functionals uniformly yet fails to minimize a convex f-divergence. It is further proved that no such separation can occur on a two-point space. Sufficient conditions for equivalence -- including stochastic ordering of likelihood ratios -- are discussed, and an open characterization problem in the geometry of moment cones is highlighted.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.