Strict 2.5D Shadows for One-Component Navier-Stokes Regularity

Abstract

We formulate and prove a conditional finite-scale reduction theorem for the local one-component regularity problem for suitable weak solutions of the three-dimensional Navier--Stokes equations. Starting from a scale-invariant bound Phi(1) <= M and smallness of the critical vertical component C3(1) = delta, the argument compares the solution with a strict two-and-a-half-dimensional shadow class. The comparison is made in the harmonic-pressure quotient, which is the natural local topology for pressure compactness. The Reynolds commutator produced by coarse graining is treated as a positive covariance stress and is absorbed by an unresolved-variance buffer; consequently this stress contributes additively, while the genuinely vertical residuals carry a positive power of delta and may pass through finite-stage exponential constants. The theorem is deliberately stated as a reduction theorem. Under the explicitly listed structural inputs--prepared pressure-covariance closure, weak horizontal-defect admissibility, sharp admissible-time trace tightness, singular-stratum tangent-cone inputs, strict limiting smoothing and decay, finite-window trace-cost/Newton solvability, and the vertical-duality active-residual estimate--we derive rreg(0,0) >= cM,theta |log C3(1)|-sigma/3. The paper does not constitute an unconditional resolution of the logarithmic one-component regularity problem. Its contribution is a theorem-driven reduction: strict-shadow selection failure is reduced to a finite-mode flat trace obstruction, and that obstruction is eliminated, conditionally, by vertical duality forced by the full three-dimensional vertical momentum equation.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…