Spatially Resolved Nebular-Stellar Reddening with JWST/NIRISS

Abstract

An accurate determination of the dust attenuation within galaxies is essential to derive key physical properties such as the star formation rate (SFR). We present an analysis using the JWST/NIRISS data from the GLASS-JWST ERS programme to investigate and characterise the stellar and nebular reddening of galaxies at 1.0<z<2.4, down to the sub-kpc scale. We use a multiregion fitting method to extract high-quality Hα and Hβ emission line maps for 99 individual galaxies across a stellar mass range 7.0<10(M*/M)<10.5. We find no evidence for ratios of the Balmer decrement (Hα/Hβ) below the intrinsic limit for Case B recombination, beyond the expected variation from observational uncertainties. We reproduce the local correlation between the Balmer decrement and total stellar mass, and find no measurable difference when splitting the sample by redshift, with negligible attenuation below 10(M*/M)8.5. Similarly, the best-fit relation between the nebular and continuum reddening follows the same relation as in local starburst galaxies, E(B-V)SED = (0.460.02)E(B-V)neb, together indicating no significant evolution in the dust geometry within galaxies out to z2.4. We derive best-fit linear relations between the differential nebular-stellar reddening and the SED-derived star formation rate (SFR) and stellar mass, finding statistically significant relations for both quantities. We use our spatially-resolved measurements to derive an empirical calibration between the resolved differential reddening, and the SFR surface density. These will enable crucial dust attenuation corrections for spatially-resolved science at higher redshifts where the Balmer lines are inaccessible, such as with future Roman grism observations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…