Closure-channel identifiability and two-channel recovery in monatomic kinetic normal shocks

Abstract

Residual agreement in a kinetic or moment equation does not automatically identify every higher-order closure variable entering a nonequilibrium shock. We formulate this issue as an observability problem for the fourth-order closure content of monatomic normal shocks and follow it through a hierarchy of collision models and diagnostics. The kinematic part of the result is independent of the collision operator: the one-dimensional heat-flux budget observes the projected fourth-order channel $S=R^{\cl}_{xx}+Δ/3$, not the tensorial R26-level moment $R^{\cl}_{xx}$ separately from the scalar fourth-order excess $Δ$. The observation map therefore has a one-dimensional null space, so a heat-flux residual can be small while the split between tensorial anisotropy and isotropic tail intensity remains wrong. A DVM-consistent scalar-excess budget supplies the missing channel and gives the two-channel reconstruction $R^{\cl}_{xx}=S-Δ/3$ without direct $R^{\cl}_{xx}$ data. Across BGK shocks at Mach 2--5, this reduces the active-zone $R^{\cl}_{xx}$ error from about $63$--$64\%$ to $2.4$--$4.1\%$. Sparse scalar-excess interpolation is used only as an information-reduction test: a representative 24-probe operating point gives $R^{\cl}_{xx}$ errors below $4.5\%$, and below $4.7\%$ with $1\%$ probe noise. Collision-model diagnostics then separate the invariant observation channel from the model-dependent source law. Shakhov changes the heat-flux relaxation to the correct Prandtl number but is neutral in the even $|\boldsymbol c|^4$ scalar-excess source; a direct discrete Shakhov channel check recovers $S$, $Δ$ and $R^{\cl}_{xx}$ with errors $6.4\times10^{-4}$, $2.1\times10^{-7}$ and $1.0\times10^{-3}$, respectively.