Joint reconstruction of H(z) and fσ8(z) with physics informed neural networks

Abstract

We present a proof of concept for the joint reconstruction of the Hubble parameter H(z) that assumes no dark energy equation of state and the growth rate of large scale structure fσ8(z) using a physics informed neural network. Rather than fitting these two observables separately and checking their consistency post hoc, we couple them through the linear growth equation of general relativity directly during training, using the equation residual evaluated at collocation points via automatic differentiation as an additional loss term. The network employs a shared backbone feeding two independent output heads, one per observable. We train an ensemble of 100 independently seeded networks on a compilation of 50 H(z) measurements from Cosmic Chronometers and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and 63 fσ8(z) measurements from Redshift Space Distortions, and study four values of the physics coupling weight λ∈ \0,\,0.01,\,0.1,\,1.0\. We then anchor the H0 normalization using two independent local distance scale determinations: the SH0ES result H0 = 73.04 1.04\,km\,s-1\,Mpc-1 and the Local Distance Network consensus H0 = 73.50 0.81\,km\,s-1\,Mpc-1. With either prior the Hubble constant is recovered exactly at the prior value, and the two reconstructions are indistinguishable in fσ8(z). The reconstructed fσ8(z) sits systematically below the ΛCDM prediction at all redshifts, consistent with the σ8 tension, while the Om(z) null test shows a marked departure from the flat ΛCDM expectation at low redshift. The results establish that coupling the two observables through the growth equation during training is both feasible and beneficial, and that the reconstruction is robust to the choice between the two local H0 determinations.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…