Something green beneath the surface: The dynamical nature of Fossil Structures in IllustrisTNG-100
Abstract
Fossil structures (FS) have traditionally been considered dynamically relaxed end-products of group evolution, characterized by a large magnitude gap (Δm1,2 ≥ 2). However, recent observations and simulations suggest this picture is incomplete. We investigate whether FS are dynamically relaxed systems and how their galaxy populations differ from non-fossil systems (non-FS), focusing on system dynamics and evolution of the galaxies inside them. Using IllustrisTNG-100, we select 182 structures (M200 > 1013\,M) at z = 0, classifying them as FS/non-FS based on Δm1,2 in the r-band. We track Δm1,2 evolution over 9\,Gyr and analyze: (1) the emergence of Δm1,2, (2) the fraction of quenched galaxies (sSFR < 10-11\,yr-1), (3) the distribution of galaxies in color--stellar mass space, and (4) the gas--BSG centroid shift as a dynamical proxy. The magnitude gap in FS is primarily driven by the absence of massive recent accretion: FS exhibit significantly lower BSG-to-satellite stellar mass ratios (μFS=0.17 vs. μNFS=0.39) for the most massive satellite accreted within the last 6\,Gyr. FS also host a more prominent red sequence and marginally higher quenched fractions than non-FS. Our findings indicate that while the magnitude gap effectively identifies systems that have ceased major mergers in the last 3-6 Gyr, it is a poor proxy for their current global dynamical state. Both FS and non-FS populations exhibit intermediate gas-BSG offsets (DBSG-CM ≈ 0.15 R/R200), failing to reach full relaxation. This decoupling suggests that the magnitude gap traces the assembly history of massive components rather than the overall stability of the intra cluster medium.
Turn this paper into a lesson
ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.