Cosmological Constraints on Minimal Cubic Galileon Models in Teleparallel Gravity

Abstract

Cubic Galileon cosmological models provide a well-motivated framework for investigating late-time cosmic acceleration beyond the standard ΛCDM paradigm. In this work, we study observational constraints on cubic Galileon models within the teleparallel gravity framework, where deviations from the standard teleparallel equivalent of general relativity are encoded through the model parameter b1. We consider two scalar-field potentials, namely quadratic and exponential potentials, and analyze four representative scenarios: quadratic and exponential potentials with b1 treated as a free parameter, together with the corresponding cases in which b1=2 is fixed. Using the Pantheon+ Type Ia supernova sample, cosmic chronometer measurements, SH0ES information, and baryon acoustic oscillation data, we constrain the cosmological and model parameters and compare the observational viability of the different scenarios. We find that the considered teleparallel cubic Galileon models can accommodate the late-time expansion history, although the statistical preference depends on the choice of potential and on whether b1 is fixed or varied. In particular, the fixed-b1 model with a quadratic potential provides the most competitive fit among the Galileon scenarios when BAO data are included, showing a lower χ2 than ΛCDM and comparable support according to the AIC criterion. However, the BIC criterion continues to favor the minimal ΛCDM model because of the larger parameter space of the extended models. These results suggest that teleparallel cubic Galileon cosmologies remain phenomenologically viable, while a stronger claim regarding the Hubble tension requires further consistency tests.

0

Turn this paper into a lesson

ArcXiv compiles a structured reading guide from this paper's metadata: plain-English importance, contributions, prerequisite concepts, which sections to read first, flashcards, and a quiz. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…