The normalized orbit of a bounded normal operator can be a frame

Abstract

Conjecture 3 in [A. Aldroubi, C. Cabrelli, I. Krishtal, and U. Molter, Dynamical Sampling: A Survey, La Matematica 5 (2026), Article 37] postulates that for any bounded normal operator T on a Hilbert space H and any vector g∈ H the system \[ \Tk g\|Tk g\|: k=0,1,2,…\ \] is not a frame. It was motivated by [A. Aldroubi, C. Cabrelli, A. F. Çakmak, U. Molter, and A. Petrosyan, Iterative actions of normal operators, J. Funct. Anal. 272 (2017), no. 3, 1121--1146], where it was established that such frames do not exist when T is a self adjoint operator. We show, however, that this conjecture is false by presenting a construction of H, T, and g such that the normalized orbit considered is indeed a frame. The operator is diagonal and is defined via a decomposition of the space into finite blocks rapidly increasing in size. We also provide an ε-perturbation S of the operator T such that the system \[ \Sk g: k=0,1,2,…\ \] is a Carleson frame in the sense of [A. Aldroubi, C. Cabrelli, U. Molter, and S. Tang, Dynamical sampling, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 42 (2017), no. 3, 378--401] and [O. Christensen, M. Hasannasab, F. M. Philipp, and D. Stoeva, The mystery of Carleson frames, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 72 (2024), Article 101659]. The constructions were achieved using ChatGPT, whose assistance was also employed in the preparation of this manuscript.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…