Closed counterexamples to Toponogov's question on mixed curvature
Abstract
We construct explicit closed Riemannian manifolds in every even dimension carrying one-dimensional totally geodesic foliations with positive mixed sectional curvature. The leaves are closed geodesics and form smooth circle fibrations. In dimensions 4m+2 the examples are constructed on S4m-1× S3; in dimensions 4m they are obtained as totally geodesic fixed point submanifolds S4m-1× S1. Since the normal rank is odd in all examples, the Ferus--Adams bound predicted by Toponogov's question would force the leaf dimension to be zero. Thus positive mixed sectional curvature alone does not imply the Ferus--Adams estimate on closed manifolds. The metrics are not bundle-like. Moreover, the examples can be chosen with mixed sectional curvature arbitrarily close to 1-pinched, and after normalizing Kmix=1, the lengths of the leaves remain uniformly bounded. The mechanism is that the positive mixed curvature operator rotates in a parallel normal frame, preventing the scalar Riccati reduction used in the constant-curvature case.
Turn this paper into a full lesson
ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.