Twisted Jacquet modules associated to maximal parabolic subgroups and cuspidal representations of GL(n, q)

Abstract

Let π be a cuspidal representation GL(n,F) over a finite field F. Let P=MN be the Levi decomposition of a maximal parabolic subgroup corresponding to the partition (k,n-k) of n. Given a rank r character ψr of the unipotent radical N, the twisted Jacquet module πN, ψr is a representation of the subgroup Mr of M which stabilizes ψr. The main problem we solve in this work is to determine the structure of πN, ψr as a Mr-module. This problem was first studied by D. Prasad, who solved the problem for the case r=k=n/2. This and subsequent works on the problem for special cases of (r,k,n), identify the structure of πN, ψr by calculating its character and matching it to a known representation of Mr. In this work we solve the problem for all values of (r,k,n) directly without calculating the character of πN, ψr. Our solution depends on two other key conceptual advances: (i) We show that the twisted Jacquet functor which takes a complex representation of P to its twisted Jacquet modules (one for each rank), gives an equivalence of categories between Rep(P) and the direct sum r Rep(Mr) of the categories Rep(Mr). (ii) We use this equivalence to construct a recursively defined representation Πk,n of P, which generalizes to P, the representation of the Mirabolic subgroup obtained from the trivial representation by iterating the Bernstein-Zelevinsky Φ+ functor. Like the representation (Φ+)n-1(1) of the Mirabolic subgroup, the representation Πn-k,n (after composing with the inverse transpose isomorphism) satisfies a universal property with respect to restrictions to P of cuspidal representations of Gn. Our solution of the main problem is a simple consequence of this universal property.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…