Testing Equivalence to the Hamiltonian Cycle Polynomial

Abstract

The Hamiltonian Cycle polynomial, denoted as $HC_n$, is defined to be the sum of the weighted Hamiltonian Cycles in an $n$-vertex complete digraph, with vertices labeled $1$ to $n$ and edges weighted by formal variables $x_{i,j}$. Valiant (STOC 1979) studied the Permanent and $HC$, defined as the family $\{HC_n | \ n \geq 1\}$, and showed both families are VNP-complete, the former over any field of characteristic other than $2$, and the latter over any field. Since its introduction, $HC$ has been studied from the perspective of lower bounds by Jerrum-Snir (JACM 1982), determinantal complexity by Huttenhain-Ikenmeyer (LAA 2016), and its relation to the Permanent by Goulden-Jackson (EJC 1981) and Grochow (ToC 2017). Its VNP-completeness over any field has been used in Malod (CCC 2007), Grochow-Mulmuley-Qiao (ICALP 2016) and Hrubes (ToCT, 2016). The Equivalence Testing problem for a polynomial $f(\mathbf{x})$ (ET for $f$) is as follows: Given $g(\mathbf{x}) \in \mathbb{F}[\mathbf{x}]$ as a black box, decide if there exists $A \in \mathrm{GL}_{|\mathbf{x}|}(\mathbb{F})$ such that $g = f(A\mathbf{x})$. Kayal (STOC 2012) gave a randomised polynomial time ET algorithm for the Permanent. In this work, we give a randomised polynomial time ET algorithm for $HC$ with mild constraints on the field. We show that, like the Permanent polynomial, the symmetries of $HC_n$ are generated by permutation and scaling matrices over large enough fields. We also show that $HC_n$ is not characterised by its symmetries, unlike the Permanent polynomial, Mulmuley-Sohoni (SIAM J. Computing, 2001). Nevertheless, like the Permanent polynomial, $HC_n$ is downward self-reducible, Zhang-Bai (TCS 2011), implying $HC_n$ is characterised by circuit identities and an efficient algorithm to test if a given circuit $\mathrm{C}$ computes $HC_n$. We also get a Flip theorem for $HC_n$ as a result of its circuit identities.