A geometric multimessenger consistency test of radiative and near-zone gravity with LISA and SKA

Abstract

Compact binary pulsars observed both through precision radio timing and low-frequency gravitational waves offer a direct way to compare the same binary geometry with two independent messengers. We propose a multimessenger consistency test based on the orbital inclination, measured from the Shapiro-delay shape parameter in radio timing and from the tensor polarization amplitude ratio in the gravitational-wave signal. Defining the common-epoch residual (t0)=s Shapiro(t0)-s GW(t0), general relativity predicts =0, while a nonzero value would indicate either an unmodeled systematic or a mismatch between the near-zone and radiative descriptions of gravity. We estimate the attainable precision on this quantity for representative LISA--SKA compact binary pulsars using a seven-parameter timing Fisher matrix and a sky-averaged LISA sensitivity curve including the Galactic foreground. We adopt a conservative radio baseline, σ TOA=1\,μ s and N eff=104, intended to summarize radiometer noise, jitter, residual dispersion-measure and scattering effects, profile evolution, and cadence losses after wideband timing. For systems at d=5\, kpc observed for four years, we find σ4×10-3 for a favorable double neutron star and σ9×10-4 for a hypothetical pulsar--black-hole system. The former is the more robust astrophysical benchmark; the latter illustrates the reach if such a high-SNR chirping source is discovered. The useful cases remain limited mainly by gravitational-wave polarimetry, while radio timing supplies the near-zone reference measurement of the inclination. These results define a quantitative target for future joint Bayesian analyses of compact binary pulsars observed in both radio and gravitational waves.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…