All you need is log

Abstract

Comparing two probability distributions is a basic building block of statistics and machine learning, and the right family is well understood: the Rényi divergences of order α∈[0,∞] are the unique family monotone under data processing and additive on independent products. Many problems instead compare more than two distributions at once -- multi-population fairness, multi-prior PAC-Bayes bounds, multi-hypothesis testing -- and the right multi-distribution generalization of the Rényi family has been an open question. We characterize it. Every functional of W-tuples of distributions that is monotone under data processing and additive on independent products is a positive integral of multi-way coincidence divergences Cα(π1,…,πW) := -∫ π1α1·sπWαW (with Σk αk = 1) over a parameter space with four strata: the simplex interior; mixed-sign exponent cones (the analogue of Rényi orders >1); a tropical boundary at infinity carrying max-divergences; and pairwise Kullback-Leibler edges at the simplex vertices. Each stratum is necessary -- the destination of an explicit data-processing-monotone, product-additive divergence the others cannot reproduce -- and each is a clean limit of simplex-interior atoms. The same family arises from several independent routes -- the structural axioms, Kolmogorov-Nagumo means with Rényi's entropy axiomatics, classical entropy characterizations, multi-hypothesis testing error exponents, and a multi-lottery betting interpretation -- structural evidence that this is the canonical multi-distribution Rényi calculus rather than an artefact of any one axiomatic input. The two-prior case recovers the standard Rényi result; a worked W=3 instance, numerical verification, and a conditional extension round out the treatment.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…