Improving the Precision of Line-by-Line Radial Velocities: A Data-Driven Iterative Algorithm for Spectral Line Selection

Abstract

Independent analysis of individual spectral lines, or line-by-line (LBL) analyses, can improve upon standard cross-correlation function (CCF) methods for measuring radial velocities (RVs) because they preserve critical information about individual line shape changes that can be caused by stellar activity. In this work, we measure LBL RVs of 3,830 spectral lines across 383 days of NEID solar observations. Our LBL approach achieves an RV RMS of 2.012~m\,s-1, which is slightly lower than the 2.129~m\,s-1 achieved by a CCF approach using a shared line list. Then, we describe and benchmark several methods for selecting line lists based on line properties such as depth and intrinsic RV scatter. We find that these subsets have a lower RV RMS compared to either the full line list or random subsets of equal size. Motivated by these results, we present FLARES (Filtering Lines for Accurate Radial-velocity Exoplanet Search), an iterative line-selection algorithm. FLARES selects candidate spectral lines with extreme values of multiple line metrics and properties such as depth, signal-to-noise ratio, and detector position, and preferentially rejects lines whose removal produces the largest decrease in the weighted RV scatter. FLARES achieves an RV RMS of 1.122~m\,s-1 using just 24 lines and performs better than the benchmark methods. We perform Monte Carlo simulations and show FLARES is robust and reproducible. Comparisons to alternative line lists chosen to have properties similar to the best FLARES-selected lines demonstrate that FLARES is successfully identifying line properties that lead to effective line lists for future extreme-precision RV measurements.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…