One-Weight Colorings, the Symmetric Class, and Lower Bounds for Hales--Jewett Numbers

Abstract

A coloring of the Hales--Jewett cube [t]n is symmetric if it is invariant under all coordinate permutations, and one-weight if it reads only an integer-weighted count of the letters. We prove that the two classes coincide -- a radix weight realizes every symmetric coloring -- so the symmetric lower-bound problem for the Hales--Jewett numbers is exactly a one-dimensional coloring problem about homothetic copies of a t-point set, the case d=1 of Gallai's theorem. Optimizing the weight yields HJ(3,3)22 and HJ(4,2)14, the latter in closed form from the new Gallai homothety numbers G2(\0,2,3,5\)=67 and G2(\0,1,5,6\)=80; new values at three colors -- G3(\0,1,3\)=42, G3(\0,1,4\)=57 and G3(\0,2,5\)77 -- give HJ(3,3)16 from a one-line certificate. An anatomy of the (4,2) palette locates the source of its compression: it is an extremal object of the bracket regime plus a single boundary scale. An exhaustive census shows how thin the class is: of the 1644 line-free 2-colorings of [3]3, exactly 36 are symmetric. For lines with at most K active coordinates the same machinery gives infinite bracket numbers, HJ[12](3,3)=HJ[12](4,2)=∞, strictly beyond the sum-type ceilings κsum(3,3)=11 and κsum(4,2)=10; for lines whose active set is an interval the machinery is provably blind, the interval ceiling λ(3,r) is settled for every r by assembling the known bounds, and a SAT computation gives the exact value HJ(1)(3)=5>4=HJ(3). We close with the Collapse, diagonal-only, and symmetric-extremality conjectures and with open problems on optimal weights. Every certificate displayed in this note has been re-verified by direct enumeration, independently of any solver.

0

Turn this paper into a full lesson

ArcXiv compiles a staged curriculum from this paper: 8-12 lessons across beginner → advanced, synthesised section guides, visuals, flashcards, a quiz, exercises, and on-demand deep dives per section. Grounded in the abstract, never invented.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion.

Loading comments…