Cross-validation of six dispersion measure estimation methods for FRB 20240114A

Abstract

Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are important cosmological probes, but their applications depend critically on accurate dispersion measure (DM) determinations. We present a systematic comparison of six DM estimation methods using 2,874 bursts from FRB20240114A, the most active repeating FRB currently known, observed by FAST during a single 4.4-hr session on 2024 March 12. This large, homogeneous sample over a short timescale, during which the propagation environment is expected to be nearly static, provides an ideal benchmark for isolating algorithmic effects on DM determination. We investigate the dependence of inter-method consistency on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), burst morphology, and radio frequency interference (RFI). Low-S/N bursts exhibit significantly larger inter-method deviations, while single-component bursts produce highly consistent DM values across methods. In contrast, complex double- and multiple-component bursts with drifting substructures lead to substantial inter-method scattering, indicating that DM discrepancies are primarily driven by algorithmic responses to burst morphology. RFI does not significantly alter the global statistical behavior of DM deviations, but it affects density-filtering methods through morphology distortion caused by frequency-channel masking. Even after imposing strict inter-method consistency constraints, FRB20240114A still exhibits notable apparent DM fluctuations spanning $\sim$528-534~pc~cm$^{-3}$ over 15,780s. For morphologically simple bursts these variations far exceed the measurement uncertainty and, on second-to-minute timescales, cannot arise from any plausible change in the line-of-sight electron column, pointing instead to a frequency-dependent emission-time structure intrinsic to the bursts that mimics dispersion.